
Egestas tincidunt ipsum in leo suspendisse turpis ultrices blandit augue eu amet vitae morbi egestas sed sem cras accumsan ipsum suscipit duis molestie elit libero malesuada lorem ut netus sagittis lacus pellentesque viverra velit cursus sapien sed iaculis cras at egestas duis maecenas nibh suscipit duis litum molestie elit libero malesuada lorem curabitur diam eros.
Tincidunt pharetra at nec morbi senectus ut in lorem senectus nunc felis ipsum vulputate enim gravida ipsum amet lacus habitasse eget tristique nam molestie et in risus sed fermentum neque elit eu diam donec vitae ultricies nec urna cras congue et arcu nunc aliquam at.

At mattis sit fusce mattis amet sagittis egestas ipsum nunc scelerisque id pulvinar sit viverra euismod. Metus ac elementum libero arcu pellentesque magna lacus duis viverra pharetra phasellus eget orci vitae ullamcorper viverra sed accumsan elit adipiscing dignissim nullam facilisis aenean tincidunt elit. Non rhoncus ut felis vitae massa mi ornare et elit. In dapibus.
At mattis sit fusce mattis amet sagittis egestas ipsum nunc. Scelerisque id pulvinar sit viverra euismod. Metus ac elementum libero arcu pellentesque magna lacus duis viverra. Pharetra phasellus eget orci vitae ullamcorper viverra sed accumsan. Elit adipiscing dignissim nullam facilisis aenean tincidunt elit. Non rhoncus ut felis vitae massa. Elementum elit ipsum tellus hac mi ornare et elit. In dapibus.
“Amet pretium consectetur dui aliquam. Nisi quam facilisi consequat felis sit elit dapibus ipsum nullam est libero pulvinar purus et risus facilisis”
Placerat dui faucibus non accumsan interdum auctor semper consequat vitae egestas malesuada quam aliquam est ultrices enim tristique facilisis est pellentesque lectus ac arcu bibendum urna nisl pharetra bibendum felis senectus dolor commodo quam elementum sapien suscipit qat non elit sagittis aliquam a cursus praesent diam lectus tellus mi lobortis in amet ac imperdiet feugiat tristique nulla eros mauris id aenean a sagittis et pellentesque integer ultricies sit non habitant in cras posuere dolor fames.
A B2B SaaS company with $8 million in annual revenue and a 14-person engineering team had been building and scaling their platform for five years. Their accounting firm handled standard tax preparation but had never conducted an R&D credit analysis or suggested the company might qualify.
The company's engineering team was responsible for developing new platform features, architecting system integrations, building internal tools for operational efficiency, and continuously improving application performance and reliability. Annual engineering payroll exceeded $2.4 million. The CTO estimated that roughly 70% of engineering time was spent on work that involved meaningful technical uncertainty rather than routine maintenance or known implementations.
The company also engaged outside contractors for specialized development work, spending approximately $300,000 per year on contract engineering resources dedicated to qualifying projects.
Our R&D credit study documented qualifying activities across four major categories: new feature development involving architectural decisions and technical trade-offs, performance optimization work that required experimentation with different approaches, system integration projects that involved resolving technical uncertainty around data handling and API behavior, and internal tooling that represented genuine technical advancement beyond commercially available alternatives.
Across three open tax years, total qualified research expenses exceeded $5.1 million. Using the ASC method, the federal credit calculation produced $71,400 in total credits. The California state credit analysis added another $20,600, bringing the combined recovery to $92,000.
Amended federal and California state returns were filed for all three years. The federal refund processed in approximately seven months. The California credit was applied as a carryforward against current-year state tax liability, providing immediate benefit on the next quarterly estimated payment.
The company now includes R&D credit analysis in their annual tax planning cycle, with projected annual savings of $28,000 to $35,000 in combined federal and state credits going forward. Their engineering leadership also implemented lightweight time-tracking practices that strengthen the documentation basis for future credit claims.
Software companies are among the strongest candidates for the R&D tax credit, but they're also among the most likely to have never been told they qualify. If your engineers are solving technical problems and building things that didn't exist before, the credit applies. The combination of high engineering salaries and the ASC calculation method typically produces meaningful credits, and the retroactive opportunity for companies that have never claimed often represents the single largest immediate tax recovery available.